Bardia Coude Red Rubber Urethral Catheter 16 Fr, 16

What is 57802516-Case Bardia Coude Red Rubber Urethral Catheter 16 Fr, 16?

The 57802516-Case Bardia Coude Red Rubber Urethral Catheter 16 Fr, 16 is a medical-grade urinary catheter designed for intermittent or short-term use. Constructed from natural red rubber, it features a coude (curved) tip that facilitates easier passage through the urethra, especially in male patients with anatomical challenges such as urethral strictures or an enlarged prostate. The 16 French size (16 Fr) ensures compatibility with standard drainage systems and is suitable for adult use. Each catheter is sterile, single-use, and intended for safe, effective bladder emptying in clinical or home care settings.

Key features

• Material — Made from flexible red rubber for biocompatibility and ease of insertion.
• Coude Tip — Curved tip aids navigation through obstructed or tortuous urethras.
• 16 Fr Size — Standard diameter balances flow rate and patient comfort.
• Sterile Packaging — Individually packaged to maintain hygiene and prevent infection.
• Latex-Based — Natural rubber offers pliability but may not suit latex-sensitive users.
• Eyelet Drainage Hole — Proximal eyelet ensures efficient urine drainage.
• Universal Use — Designed for both hospital and home healthcare environments.

Who is 57802516-Case Bardia Coude Red Rubber Urethral Catheter 16 Fr, 16 for?

This catheter is ideal for male patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), urethral strictures, or post-surgical urinary retention. It's also suited for clinicians managing difficult catheterizations in acute or long-term care. Due to its latex content, it is not recommended for individuals with latex allergies. Patients requiring frequent intermittent catheterization may benefit from the coude tip’s precision, though long-term use should be medically supervised.

How does 57802516-Case Bardia Coude Red Rubber Urethral Catheter 16 Fr, 16 compare?

Compared to standard polypropylene or silicone catheters, the red rubber construction offers greater flexibility and tip control, making it preferable for challenging insertions. However, it is less suitable for extended dwell times than silicone alternatives. Unlike hydrophilic catheters, it requires external lubrication but is more cost-effective. The coude tip differentiates it from straight-tip models, particularly beneficial in male urological care where anatomical barriers exist.